Former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden debate at CNN's Atlanta studios on June 27, 2024.
Editor’s Note: Todd Grahamis a professor of debate at Southern Illinois University. His teams have won five national championships; he’s been named the national debate coach of the year three times and been presented with the lifetime achievement award in academia and debate. The views expressed in this commentary are his own. View moreopinionat CNN.
CNN —
In a presidential debate, I’m expecting to leave the event with more knowledge about future policymaking than when the debate began. In the first 2024 presidential debate in Atlanta on Thursday night, the performances ofPresident Joe Biden and former President DonaldTrump failed to live up to thatexpectation.
Here’s how they scored on substance, presentation and overall performance.
Former President Donald Trump's presentation fared better than his substance, says champion debate coach, Graham Todd.
TRUMP
SUBSTANCE: F
The three most important aspects of a presidential debate are answering the questions presented to demonstrate the candidate’s mastery of the subject,avoiding misinformationor outright lies andlaying outplans for the future. In that regard, Trump failed. Themoderators’questions often remained on screen while Trump wassupposed to be addressingthem, and he rarely answeredthem.
When asked if hesupports an independent Palestinian state, Trumpsaid:“I’d have to see.”And thenhetalked about the European economy, cars, agriculture and payments to NATO with different levels of honesty. I don’t know more about Trump’s position and solution tothe war in Gazathan I did before the debate. And he did this with almost every question.
He also used his speaking time to go ontangents about off-topic issues.Often, Trumpjustspoutedridiculous hyperbole,sometimesto the point of lying.
Examplesinclude Trump saying that foreign countries think we are stupid, our border is the most dangerous place in the world, we areallowing abortions after birth, we are an uncivilized country, the Afghanistan withdrawal was the most embarrassing moment in American history, our country is being destroyed, America is a failed state and a third world nation—and the list goes on. The boy who cried wolf can only be believed so many times.
Presentation: B+
This was by far the biggest factor in the debate. Trump handled his emotions better than in previous debates, didn’t get overly rude (other than calling Biden“Brandon,” butthatseemed to gomostly unnoticed). Indeed, Trump was able to criticize Biden with humor whenhe said, “I really don’t know what he said at the end of that sentence. I don’t think he knows what he said either.” At one point Trump even chastised Biden bysaying, “Let’s not act like children.”
Trump had good vocal quality and energy. While his answers may have strayed, his demeanor, presentation and style were miles better than Biden’s.
Finally, Trump’s presentation was focused on two voting issues: immigration and the economy. He covered his strongest issues by repeating them over and over. Repetition becomes persuasive whendoneenough, and Trump stayed on his strongest points, even if he wasn’t answering the questions at hand.
Overall Trump grade: F
You simplycan’tliein debates as often as Trump does if the activity is to be taken seriously.
President Joe Biden struggled to deliver his message forcefully, argues Graham.
BIDEN
Substance: D
Biden’s answers were more on-point than Trump’s, but they weren’t great by any stretch. He lacked focus when answering the questions which generally left the audience at home with no takeaways. Whatdoyou remember about Biden’s answers in this debate? I’ve got nothing.
My goodness Biden’s skills have diminishedsince their last debate four years ago. Hehad no real strategy to win this debate as far as I can tell, and that came through in his answers.
On the topic of the national debt, Biden began his response fine, but then went too far into the weeds with numbers, andfinishedby saying something about Covid-19 and “we finally beat Medicare.” What?
Both Trump and Biden rambled, but each in a different style. Trump, used to public speeches and rallies, told stories that may or may not have beenrelevant or true. Biden’s lack of focusmeantthat he failed to clearly explain his accomplishments, and he didn’tsharply criticize Trump. If Biden wanted to prove Trump was a threat to democracy, he failed.
One reason for Biden’s poor content was that he was doing double duty. Biden had to both answer the question and answer all Trump’s attacks. Trump was using hyperbole and‘Gish gallop’(the tactic ofthrowing lots of arguments against the wall to see what sticks, truth be damned).On his own,Biden’s task was nearly impossible.
Answering all of Trump’s non sequiturs would require much more speaking time, because it takes more time to clean up a mess than to make one. And Biden didn’t help himself out by overextending his answers to the point of confusion. For example, in an unforced error, when asked about abortion, Biden brought up how an immigrant murdered someone, playing right into Trump’s hands.
Overall, he gets credit for answering the questions, even though they were hard to follow at times.
Presentation: F-
If Biden was going for the deer-in-headlights approach, he nailed it.
In countless interviews before the debate, I said the most important thing for Bidento dowasavoid the two preconceived notionsthat his opponents have hammered him with: lacking energy and mental fitness. All related, of course, to his age.
Biden’s performance amplified these criticisms. His opening gate was slow – much slower than Trump’s. His speech patterns were unorganizedandhe lacked any real vocal strength. Plus, he appeared much older than Trump with his pale skin and his wide-eyed staring at either Trump or the moderators when they were speaking, which also made him seem confused. Biden wasn’t articulateand lacked sharp pronunciation. There were verbal stumbles, which is expected, but there weren’t any recovery periods.
It seems as if Biden lost his ability to emphasize some points over others with his vocal quality. There wasn’t any variety in his pitch, volume or speech rate. Everything sounded the same. Perhaps he was under the weather and, if so, the hoarse voice came at the worst possible time.
Or, maybe that’s just how he speaks, which clearly makes him sound quite old indeed.
In the end, all that matters is the impression the American public have of Biden, and this debate put an exclamation point on some of his harshest flaws.
Then there were stumbles, like whenhe saidtrillionaires instead of billionaires andParis Peace Accord instead of the Paris Climate Accords. At one point, Biden confused Trump with Putin.At another point,Trump inserted on the topic of immigration thatBiden didn’tevenknow what he was saying;it brought to the forefront what many people were thinking.
When asked aboutbeing president athis age, Biden answered by listing a few accomplishments. But this didn’t come close to being a good answer. I thought he’d be more prepared for this question, so when he didn’t nail it, it only reinforced the notion that Biden is too old—that it might be too late for him to right the ship.
This debate was Biden’s golden opportunity to wash away his critics. Instead, he gave them all they wanted and more.
Overall Biden grade: F
Playing into stereotypes and criticisms, Biden had a worse night than Trump. But neither would get my vote based on this debate.
